Madelief Hageman vs Sofia Avataneo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 09:47 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hageman vs S. Avataneo

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hageman 1 - 0 Avataneo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Madelief Hageman winning 2 and Sofia Avataneo winning 0. The last match between Madelief Hageman and Sofia Avataneo was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 02-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Madelief Hageman getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Hageman | 1 |
Avataneo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Sharm ElSheikh(10-02-25)
M. Hageman vs S. Avataneo H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
50.55% (137-134) | Career Total W/L | 41.33% (62-88) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Hageman vs S. Avataneo Match Preview:
- In recent months, Madelief Hageman has outperformed Sofia Avataneo on second serve points, winning 38.28% compared to Avataneo's 34.55%. Does this give Hageman an advantage? It certainly suggests a stronger serve game.
- When examining return game effectiveness, Avataneo leads by winning 57.39% of her opponent's second serve points, while Hageman secures 49.08%. This could give Avataneo an edge in breaking serves.
- In terms of first serve returns, Hageman holds a slight advantage, capturing 38.2% of points compared to Avataneo's 33.66%.
- Under pressure scenarios show that Hageman saves 47.58% of breakpoints, while Avataneo saves 36.52%, suggesting Hageman may perform better in critical match moments.
- Looking at overall match performance in the past year, Hageman has a superior win rate of 51.61%, while Avataneo's is 27.78%.
- Evaluating surface performance, Avataneo favors Hard courts with a 44% win rate, whereas Hageman performs best on Clay at 44%, indicating surface preference could be a factor.
- Hageman's matches against lower-ranked opponents (average rank of 331.81) compared to Avataneo's more competitive match-ups (average rank of 212.17) imply different levels of challenge faced.
- The deciding set performance shows Hageman leading with a 43% win rate in comparison to Avataneo's 30% over the last year.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
Madelief Hageman appears to have a stronger recent competitive form, especially regarding her ability to win on her second serve and handle crucial points under pressure. This can be pivotal in tight matches.
Sofia Avataneo, on the other hand, excels in return games, where she has demonstrated a significant ability to break opponent serves. However, her lower percentage of saving breakpoints could prove disadvantageous.
Considering the win statistics and the level of competition they have faced over the last year, Hageman shows more consistency, giving her an advantage in head-to-head predictions.
Factoring in all the data and current form trends, Madelief Hageman is likely to be the victor in this upcoming match.
Madelief Hageman vs Sofia Avataneo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Hageman vs S. Avataneo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:46:6 | Average Match Time | 1:46:6 |
66% (31/47) | 1st Serve % | 50% (33/66) |
68% (21/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (19/33) |
38% (6/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (11/33) |
56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
55% (36/66) | Return Points Win % | 43% (20/47) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Hageman Recent Matches Played
S. Avataneo Recent Matches Played

M. Hageman vs S. Avataneo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
50.55% (137/134) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.33% (62/88) |
49.84% (311/313) | Sets Win/Loss | 41.00% (139/200) |
51.36% (2972/2815) | Games Win/Loss | 47.06% (1491/1677) |
40.00% (14/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.82% (39/50) |
51.74% (119/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.82% (23/32) |
66.67% (4/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/6) |
0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
185 | Aces Total | 53 |
0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
557 | Total Double Faults | 319 |
1:20:52 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
337.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 67.27 |
65% (8728/13414) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3073/4899) |
57% (4969/8728) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (1608/3073) |
44% (2061/4686) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (729/1826) |
49% (862/1757) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (298/636) |
47% (6267/13240) | Return Points Win % | 47% (2277/4853) |
39.47% (15/23) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
52.36% (122/111) | Futures W/L | 42.25% (60/82) |
50% (136/270) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (60/148) |
20% (9/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (8/16) |
54% (45/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (24/41) |
86% (133/114) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (58/51) |
14% (133/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (58/7) |
17% (138/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (92/10) |